IR Home
DAO
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
Order
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
| |
DAO 44:53-60 (2001)
|
Abstract
|

First report of the invasive eel pest Pseudodactylogyrus bini in North America and in wild American eels
Craig J. Hayward1,*, Makoto Iwashita1, John S. Crane2, Kazuo Ogawa1
1Department of Aquatic Bioscience, Graduate School of Agriculture, University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
2South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, 1921 Van Boklen Road, Eastover, South Carolina 29044, USA
*Present address: Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Chongju, Chungbuk 361-763, Korea. E-mail: chayward@trut.chungbuk.ac.kr

ABSTRACT: We detected 2 species of monogenean gill worms, Pseudodactylogyrus bini (Kikuchi, 1929) Gusev, 1965 and P. anguillae (Yin & Sproston, 1948) Gusev, 1965 (Monopisthocotylea: Pseudodactylogyridae), on American eel Anguilla
rostrata in 2 rivers in South Carolina, USA. One of these, P. anguillae, was reported 5 yr ago from Nova Scotia; as well as in South Carolina, we also discovered it in 2 localities in Chesapeake Bay. Differences in the morphologies of specimens
of either species of worm from North America and northeastern Asia were negligible. Similarly, the level of variation in sequences in the ITS2 (internal transcribed spacers) region of ribosomal RNA was minor, and not consistent with geographical origin.
These data indicate that these monogeneans invaded North America only recently, possibly in parallel with the nematode Anguillicola crassus (which is known to have been introduced with commercial imports of foreign eels). We map the current
global occurrence of these monogeneans, and conclude that their dispersal from northeastern Asia was largely as a result of the eel trade, and has probably been secondarily augmented by longshore migration of infected eels, and possibly also by transport
in ballast waters. With present technology, all eel stocks must still be collected from the wild; unless shipments are disinfected at quarantine, these and other eel pathogens (such as A. crassus) are likely to continue to colonise other regions of
the world.
KEY WORDS: Biological invasion · Anguilla · Pseudodactylogyrus · Ballast · Monogenean · Pest
Full text in pdf format

Published in DAO Vol.
44, No. 1
(2001) on January 26
ISSN: 0177-5103.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2001
|