IR Home
CR
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
CR SPECIAL 1
CR SPECIAL 2
CR SPECIAL 3
CR SPECIAL 4
CR SPECIAL 5
CR SPECIAL 6
CR SPECIAL 7
CR SPECIAL 8
CR SPECIAL 9
CR SPECIAL 10
CR SPECIAL 11
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
ESR
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
IR Research
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
![](../../../../images/pixel.gif) | ![](../../../../images/pixel.gif) |
CR 28:123-132 (2005)
|
Abstract
|
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
Comparison of the Thornthwaite method and pan data with the standard Penman-Monteith estimates of reference evapotranspiration in China
Deliang Chen1,2,*, Ge Gao1,2, Chong-Yu Xu3, Jun Guo4, Guoyu Ren2
1Regional Climate Group, Earth Sciences Centre, Gothenburg University, PO Box 460, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden 2Laboratory for Climate Studies/National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, No. 46 Zhongguancun
Nandajie, Haidian, Beijing 100081, China 3Dept of Earth Sciences, Hydrology, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden 4Tianjin Meteorological Bureau, 100 Qixiangtai Road, Hexi District, Tianjin 300074,
China
*Email: deliang@gvc.gu.se
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
ABSTRACT: Various methods are available to estimate reference evapotranspiration (ET0) from standard meteorological observations. The Penman-Monteith method is considered to be the most physical and reliable method and is often used as a
standard to verify other empirical methods. This study estimates and compares the monthly ET0 calculated by 3 methods at 580 Chinese stations over the last 50 yr. The Penman-Monteith method is used here as a reference, and its spatial and
temporal differences with the Thornthwaite method and pan measurement are evaluated. The results show that: (1) in terms of spatial difference, the Thornthwaite estimates show different regional patterns, while pan measurements display a consistent
regional pattern; (2) the temporal variability of ET0 is much better represented by pan measurements than by the Thornthwaite estimates. Overall, pan measurements are more useful than the Thornthwaite estimates if appropriate pan coefficients
are determined. The Thornthwaite method only considers the temperature and latitude and gives unreliable results under dry conditions, e.g. in NW China. With reference to the Penman-Monteith estimates, the correction factors (pan coefficients) of pan
measurements for the whole of China, and the regional averages over the 10 major drainage basins are determined. The average value lies between 0.6 and 0.8, although a seasonal and regional difference is present.
KEY WORDS: Reference evapotranspiration · Water evaporation · Penman-Monteith · Thornthwaite · Pan · China
Full text in pdf format
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
Published in CR Vol.
28, No. 2
(2005) on March 16
Print ISSN: 0936-577X; Online ISSN: 1616-1572.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2005
|