IR Home
CR
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
CR SPECIAL 1
CR SPECIAL 2
CR SPECIAL 3
CR SPECIAL 4
CR SPECIAL 5
CR SPECIAL 6
CR SPECIAL 7
CR SPECIAL 8
CR SPECIAL 9
CR SPECIAL 10
CR SPECIAL 11
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
![](../../../../images/pixel.gif) | ![](../../../../images/pixel.gif) |
CR 15:69-81 (2000)
|
Abstract
|
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
Impact of climate change on a landslide in South East France, simulated using different GCM scenarios and downscaling methods for local precipitation
Jelle Buma1,*, Martin Dehn2
1Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
2Department of Geography, University of Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 166, 53115 Bonn, Germany
*Present address: Engineering Department, Rotterdam Public Works, PO Box 6633, 3002AP Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: j.buma@gw.rotterdam.nl
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
ABSTRACT: The aim of this paper is to assess the influence of different climate scenarios on scenarios for the impact variable 'landslide activity'. For this purpose, a site-specific model was used, relating the activity of a landslide in South East
France to climate. Landslide activity was reconstructed from tree ring data. Hydrological field data indicated that the controlling climatic variable is net precipitation (precipitation minus evapotranspiration). However, this variable and hence the
impact model could not explain all of the variations in landslide activity. The landslide model was fed with 1 temperature and several precipitation scenarios obtained by applying 3 different methods for downscaling 3 different general circulation model
(GCM) simulations of the large-scale climate. The skill of the downscaling methods in reproducing the historical local precipitation was either limited or trivial, but fair enough to justify further application. The resulting scenarios for landslide
activity were quite similar, with the exception of 2 specific combinations of GCM and downscaling method. Furthermore, short-term climatic variation, plausibly represented in one of the downscaling methods as a random noise component, caused additional
variation in the resulting scenarios. The amount of variation in the climate scenarios is of the same order of magnitude as that in the landslide model. The general conclusion is not to focus on calibrating impact models while using only 1 climate
scenario, but to assess the overall uncertainty of the impact scenario by considering different parameter settings of the impact model as well as different climate scenarios, as was done in the present study.
KEY WORDS: Landslide activity · Hydrology · Climate change impact · Downscaling · GCMs
Full text in pdf format
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
Published in CR Vol.
15, No. 1
(2000) on May 15
Print ISSN: 0936-577X; Online ISSN: 1616-1572.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2000
|