IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
ESR
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
IR Research
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 |  |
MEPS 291:189-196 (2005)
|
Abstract
|

Dominance hierarchies in xanthid crabs: roles in resource-holding potential and field distributions
Kenneth M. Brown1,*, Sean F. Keenan2, Patrick D. Banks3
1Department of Biological Sciences, and 2Department of Oceanography & Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA 3Marine Fisheries Division, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and
Fisheries, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, USA
*Email: kmbrown@lsu.edu

ABSTRACT: We used laboratory experiments to determine the dominance hierarchy of 3 xanthid crabs occurring along the Louisiana Gulf of Mexico coast. Juveniles of the stone crab Menippe adina were dominant over adult Eurypanopeus
depressus, which were in turn dominant over adult Panopeus simpsoni. The relationship of agonism to body size differed among species, with larger stone crabs initiating fewer behaviors of all types, while agonism was more frequent in
medium-sized P. simpsoni and large E. depressus. Even when stone crabs were smaller than the other 2 species, they exibited similar levels of agonism, perhaps explaining how juvenile stone crabs can coexist with and grow
through the size range of the 2 small xanthids before the emigrate from oyster reefs to pursue a solitary existence as adults. As predicted by game theory, for both food and shelter resources, dominance hierarchy predicted resource-holding potential
(RHP). Stone crabs were more successful at acquiring and defending resources than P. simpsoni, and RHP for shelter was not reversed when stone crabs were smaller. A year-long field sampling study indicated that both M. adina
and E. depressus were more common in subtidal habitats with shelter, while P. simpsoni was more abundant in an intertidal oyster reef and on a mud flat lacking shelter. We argue that these distributions could be explained by
the lower ranking of P. simpsoni in the dominance hierarchy, and that behavioral interactions may thus play a role in shaping mud crab distributions, and deserve study of their role in explaining the distribution of other crabs as well.
KEY WORDS: Agonism · Dominance hierarchy · Mud crabs · Distributions
Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol.
291
(2005) on April 28
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2005
|