IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
ESR
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
IR Research
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 | |
MEPS 286:69-79 (2005)
|
Abstract
|
Seagrass and epiphytic algae support nutrition of a fisheries species, Sillago schomburgkii, in adjacent intertidal habitats
Rod M. Connolly1,2,*, Jeremy S. Hindell3, Daniel Gorman1
1Centre for Aquatic Processes and Pollution, and School of Environmental and Applied Sciences, Griffith University, PMB 50, Gold Coast Mail Centre, Queensland 9726, Australia
2The Cooperative Research Centre for Coastal Zone,
Estuary and Waterway Management, 80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia
3Marine and Freshwater Systems, Primary Industries Research Victoria, Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 114, Queenscliff, Victoria 3225,
Australia
*Email: r.connolly@griffith.edu.au
ABSTRACT: The importance of organic matter produced in seagrass meadows (seagrass and epiphytic algae) to the nutrition of a valuable fisheries species (yellowfin whiting Sillago schomburgkii Peters) occurring over unvegetated mudflats was measured
using the isotopic composition (δ13C, δ15N) of fish, their polychaete prey, and available autotrophic sources at several locations in southern Australia during 2 periods (summer, winter). Values for δ13C
and δ15N for autotrophs and fishes varied little between seasons. Sources could be separated into 3 groups based on δ13C: seagrass and epiphytes (mean δ13C = –10.5‰), benthic microalgae and
macroalgae (–19.5‰), and saltmarsh and mangroves (–26.5‰). Values of δ15N for the sources were 2 to 5‰. Values of δ13C for fish (–13.3‰) corresponded with those of their polychaete prey
(–12.5‰) and ultimately with those of seagrass and epiphytes. Values of δ15N were 5 to 6‰ more enriched than sources. Modelling of feasible source mixtures showed that seagrass and epiphytes were the most important
contributors to the nutrition of fish, but their relative importance varied between seasons. The median contribution by other sources was <10%. Spatial analyses showed that saltmarsh plants contributed significantly to the variability in S.
schomburgkii nutrition among locations, while macroalgae contributed in summer. The similarity in δ13C values of polychaetes and S. schomburgkii is consistent with source material from a subtidal habitat being incorporated into
food webs supporting a fisheries species in adjacent intertidal habitats via a largely sedentary intermediary.
KEY WORDS: Posidonia · Mangrove · Saltmarsh · Algae · Sillaginidae · Diet · Trophic ecology
Full text in pdf format
Published in MEPS Vol.
286
(2005) on February 2
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2005
|
