Marine Ecology Progress Series

Inter-Research
Marine Ecology Progress Series

IR Home



MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe


Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
ESR
Search
Subscribe

Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order

EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)

Discussion Forums
Home

Research
IR Research

Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union

Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation

MEPS 280:239-247 (2004)

Abstract

Checking the landing zone: Do invertebrate larvae avoid settling near superior spatial competitors?

Stephan G. Bullard1,3, Robert B. Whitlatch1,*, Richard W. Osman2

1Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA
2Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, PO Box 28, 647 Contees Wharf Road, Edgewater, Maryland 21037, USA
3Present address: University of Hartford Hillyer College, 200 Bloomfield Av., West Hartford, Connecticut 06117, USA

*Corresponding author. Email: robert.whitch@ucom.edu

ABSTRACT: It has been hypothesized that larvae of benthic marine invertebrates may reduce their risk of post-settlement competition by avoiding superior competitors during settlement. Few studies, however, have directly compared the levels of larval settlement close to and away from established competitors. We conducted experiments in the New England subtidal to determine whether larvae of fouling organisms would avoid substrata (100 cm2 PVC panels) with established adult colonies of the tunicates Botryllus schlosseri, Botrylloides violaceus, and Diplosoma listerianum compared to control substrata without tunicates. After panels had been exposed for 1 wk in the field, we assessed larval settlement on the entire surface of panels and within 1 cm of established tunicate colonies. We also monitored the fate of larvae that settled near established tunicates to determine if different tunicate species posed different risks of overgrowth to newly settled juveniles. Pair-wise comparisons revealed only 1 significant difference (out of 48 total analyses) when we examined levels of settlement on panels with tunicates relative to bare controls. We also found no significant differences in the number of settlers overgrown by different tunicate species. Thus, our results suggest that invertebrate larvae do not avoid settling near established dominant competitors (i.e. colonial tunicates). These results are in contrast to a previous study which had shown that larvae of competitively inferior species avoided settling near B. schlosseri.

KEY WORDS: Ascidians · Competition · Cues · Larvae · Overgrowth · Settlement · Tunicates

Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol. 280 (2004) on October 14
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599. Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2004

Copyright © 2004; Inter-Research
Webmaster: webmaster@int-res.com