IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
ESR
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
IR Research
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 | |
MEPS 278:205-223 (2004)
|
Abstract
|
Interacting effects of Hydrobia ulvae bioturbation and microphytobenthos on the erodibility of mudflat sediments
Francis Orvain1,3,*, Pierre-Guy Sauriau1, Angélique Sygut1, Lucette Joassard1, Pierre Le Hir2
1CREMA (CNRS-IFREMER UMR 10), Centre de Recherche sur les Ecosystèmes Marins et Aquacoles de L'Houmeau, Place du séminaire BP5, 17137 L'Houmeau, France
2IFREMER, Centre de Brest, DEL/EC-TP, BP 70, 29280 Plouzané, France
3Present address:
LBBM Laboratoire de Biologie et de Biotechnologie Marine, Université de Caen, Esplanade de la Paix, 14032, Caen Cedex, France
*Email: f.orvain@iutcaen.unicaen.fr
ABSTRACT: Microphytobenthos-macrofauna sediment interactions and their effects on sediment erodability were examined in laboratory experiments. Sediment beds were manipulated in a tidal mesocosm to produce diatom mats in exponential or in stationary
phases of development after 6, 8 or 11 d of culture. These sediment beds were used in flume experiments to investigate the influence of bioturbation by the gastropod Hydrobia ulvae on both sediment and pigment resuspension as a function of the
physiological state of the microphytobenthic mats. In most experiments, only a surface layer was resuspended. A model was used to analyse in detail the contribution of each variable to this surface-layer erosion. Bioturbation was the major factor
controlling resuspension, and its extent was influenced by sediment density and the growth stage of the microphytobenthos. The amount and extent of bioturbation is assumed to be influenced by sediment density and chlorophyll a content. Snail
bioturbation can, in turn, influence the amount of microalgal resuspension. The quantity of pigment resuspended due to bioturbation increased by a factor of 15 when the diatom mats were in exponential growth stages. However, as the age of the mat
increased, the influence of bioturbation on pigment resuspension declined. When the mats became senescent, Type I erosion occurred with erosion rates high enough to obscure any effects of bioturbation. To summarise, we assume that there are 2 causes of
microphytobenthos resuspention, depending on the physiological state of the mat: (1) in the exponential phase, bioturbation substantially affects the resuspension of pigments which are present in the surface layer (the biogenic fluff layer) and (2) in the
senescent phase, the increase in bed roughness and water content renders the mat fragile, leading to bed erosion.
KEY WORDS: Resuspension · Microphytobenthos · Physiological state · Hydrobia ulvae · Model · Erosion · Bioturbation · Sediment
Full text in pdf format
Published in MEPS Vol.
278
(2004) on September 6
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2004
|
