IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
ESR
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
IR Research
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 |  |
MEPS 277:25-36 (2004)
|
Abstract
|

Nearest neighbors as foraging cues: information transfer in a patchy environment
Emily D. Silverman1,*, Richard R. Veit2, Gabrielle A. Nevitt3
1School of Natural Resources & Environment, University of Michigan, 430 E. University, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1115, USA
2Department of Biology, College of Staten Island, City University of New York, 2800 Victory Boulevard, Staten Island, New York 10314, USA
3Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, California 95616, USA
*Email: esilver@umich.edu

ABSTRACT: To assess the importance of both conspecifics and heterospecifics as cues to prey location, we analyzed patterns of seabird species co-occurrence along shipboard transects conducted near South Georgia (55°S, 35°W) during the austral summer.
Using data collected over 9 d and 1500 km ocean, we focused on the behavior of 4 seabird species that are abundant in Antarctic waters: black-browed albatross Thalassarche melanophrys, white-chinned petrel Procellaria aequinoctialis, prion
Pachyptila spp., and diving petrel Pelecanoides spp. We identified and recorded the behavior of the nearest neighbors of focal, flying individuals and demonstrated strong intraspecific associations for all 4 species. More conspecific
neighbors of prions and diving petrels were also observed flying than expected due to chance. This result suggests that these birds may forage co-operatively with conspecifics. In contrast, more heterospecific neighbors were feeding than expected, and
more heterospecific neighbors of white-chinned petrels, prions, and diving petrels were black-browed albatross and groups of penguins and Antarctic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella than expected by chance. We show that associations among foraging
birds are not random and are not due to species-specific differences in foraging habitat. We present methods that can be used to measure and compare the strength of intra- and interspecific association among predators at sea. Our results suggest that
local enhancement is an important component of the foraging strategies of Antarctic seabirds.
KEY WORDS: Seabirds · Foraging · Nearest neighbor · Black-browed albatross · Local enhancement · South Georgia · Compositional data analysis
Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol.
277
(2004) on August 16
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2004
|