IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
ESR
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
IR Research
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 | |
MEPS 277:117-133 (2004)
|
Abstract
|
Effect of grazing by limpets on mid-shore species assemblages in northern Spain
J. Arrontes1,*, F. Arenas2, C. Fernández1, J. M. Rico1, J. Oliveros1, B. Martínez3, R. M. Viejo3, D. Alvarez1
1Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas, Universidad de Oviedo, 33071 Oviedo, Spain
2Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Prospect Place, Plymouth PL1 2PB, UK
3Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
*Email: arrontes@uniovi.es
ABSTRACT: Limpets were excluded from barnacle-dominated areas in 2 semi-exposed localities on the shore of northern Spain. We tested the hypotheses that a macroalgal canopy would develop and barnacle cover would decrease in exclusion quadrats. Spatial
replication considered localities and sites within localities, while temporal replication considered 2 seasons of removal and 2 start dates within each locality and season. The experimental methods included exclusion quadrats (using fences), procedural
controls (half fences) and untouched controls. Results supported both hypotheses. Limpet removal caused exclusion quadrats to change over time more than controls. An algal canopy dominated by Fucus vesiculosus developed and more barnacles were lost
in exclusion quadrats than in controls. In addition, more trochids (largely Gibbula spp.) and whelks (Thais lapillus) were found in exclusion quadrats. Site effects were significant for virtually all variables analysed but no effect of
locality, season or date was found. An indirect effect mediated by the development of an algal canopy appeared to be responsible for the loss of barnacles in exclusion quadrats. This indirect effect might have been reinforced by an additional indirect
effect of algae mediated by increased densities of whelks under the algal canopy. Altogether, our results agree with those in semi-exposed shores in other parts of the world but not with results obtained in the west coast of Sweden, which has contrasting
environmental conditions and a different dominant grazer species.
KEY WORDS: Grazing · Community structure · Indirect effects · Patella spp. · Fucus spp. · Spain
Full text in pdf format
Published in MEPS Vol.
277
(2004) on August 16
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2004
|
