IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
ESR
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
IR Research
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 |  |
MEPS 271:13-26 (2004)
|
Abstract
|

Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling
George B. Arhonditsis1,2,*, Michael T. Brett1
1Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, More Hall, Box 352700, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
2Present address: Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
*Email: georgear@duke.edu

ABSTRACT: The need for predictive process-oriented planktonic ecosystem models is widely recognized by the aquatic science community. We conducted a meta-analysis of recent mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical models (153 studies published from 1990 to
2002), to assess their ability to predict spatial and temporal patterns in the physical, chemical and biological dynamics of planktonic systems. The selected modeling studies covered a wide range of model complexity, ecosystem-types, spatio-temporal
scales and purposes for model development. Despite the heterogeneous nature of this data set, we were able to identify model behavior trends and illuminate aspects of current modeling practice that need to be reevaluated. Temperature and dissolved oxygen
had the highest coefficients of determination (respective median r2 values were 0.93 and 0.70) and the lowest relative error (median RE < 10%), nutrients and phytoplankton had intermediate predictability (median r2 values
ranging from 0.40 to 0.60 and median RE ~ 40%), whereas bacteria (median r2 = 0.06) and zooplankton (median RE = 70%) dynamics were poorly predicted. Longer simulation periods (i.e. months to decades) reduced model predictability, and increased
model complexity did not improve fit. Aquatic biogeochemical modelers need to be more consistent in how they apply conventional methodological steps during model development (i.e. sensitivity analysis, validation), and the aquatic modeling community
should adopt generally accepted standards of model performance. Recent advancements in data assimilation techniques, the combination of the present family of models with goal functions (derived from non-equilibrium thermodynamics) and the development of
models with a stronger physiological basis are promising frameworks for obtaining more accurate simulations of planktonic processes.
KEY WORDS: Ecological modeling · Model complexity · Eutrophication · Aquatic biogeochemical cycles · Plankton systems
Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol.
271
(2004) on April 28
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2004
|