IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 |  |
MEPS 263:43-64 (2003)
|
Abstract
|

Macrozooplankton communities and environmental variables in the Barents Sea marginal ice zone in late winter and spring
Janne E. Søreide1,2,3,*, Haakon Hop1, Stig Falk-Petersen1, Bjørn Gulliksen2, Edmond Hansen1
1Norwegian Polar Institute, 9296 Tromsø, Norway
2Norwegian College of Fishery Science, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
3Present address: Akvaplan-niva, 9296 Tromsø, Norway
*Email: jes@akvaplan.niva.no

ABSTRACT: The horizontal distribution of macrozooplankton (≥3 mm) was studied with respect to changes in environmental conditions along 3 transects across the marginal ice zone (MIZ) in the NW Barents Sea during late winter (March 2000) and spring (
1999). The water masses, which were identified by their salinity and temperature characteristics, largely determined the macrozooplankton composition, but season (late winter vs spring), geographical area (latitude and longitude) and bottom depth were
also important. Almost 80% of the total macrozooplankton variability could be explained by changes in these environmental variables. Ice cover and the algal bloom situation had no significant impact on the horizontal macrozooplankton distribution early in
the season (March to May). We sampled 3 main water masses: cold and less saline Arctic water (ArW), warm and saline Atlantic water (AtW) and mixtures of these (MIX); 5 distinct macrozooplankton communities were found, 2 in ArW (ArW bank and ArW slope), 2
in MIX (warm, >1°C, and cold, <0°C, MIX) and 1 in AtW. These communities were characterised by differences in species abundance rather than differences in taxonomic composition. Numerically important macrozooplankton were Calanus glacialis,
C. hyperboreus, Thysanoessa inermis and Aglantha digitale. These were also important in terms of wet biomass together with Beröe cucumis, Clione limacina and Sagitta elegans. Good indicator species for ArW were
C. glacialis, C. limacina, Mertensia ovum and Parathemisto libellulla, and for AtW Thysanoessa spp. (T. inermis, T. longicaudata and T. raschii). Characteristic for MIX, i.e. the Polar Front region,
was low macrozooplankton abundance, biomass and species richness compared to AtW and ArW. Seasonal variability (late winter vs spring) accounted for 21% of the total macrozooplankton variability. Particularly the herbivores showed large seasonal
variability in abundance and biomass, most probably due to their seasonal migration patterns.
KEY WORDS: Macrozooplankton · Barents Sea · Marginal ice zone · Multivariate community analyses · Ordination
Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol.
263
(2003) on November 28
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2003
|