IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 |  |
MEPS 257:197-207 (2003)
|
Abstract
|

Intense removal and non-saturating functional responses by recreational divers on spiny lobster Panulirus argus
David B. Eggleston1,*, Eric G. Johnson1, G. Todd Kellison1,2, David A. Nadeau1
1North Carolina State University, Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8208, USA
2Present address: Biscayne National Park, 9700 SW 328th Street, Homestead, Florida 33033, USA
*Email: eggleston@ncsu.edu

ABSTRACT: The effects of recreational fishing often go undetected, yet can lead to the collapse of fishery populations. Fishery managers must understand the dynamics of recreational fishers and their prey to successfully predict the outcome of management
actions. We measured the impact of a 2 d exclusively recreational fishery on the Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus in the Florida Keys, USA, and used a theoretical, predator-prey functional response approach to identify whether or not sport
diver catch rates were density-independent or -dependent (Types I, II or III functional response), and if catch rates were saturated (i.e. reached an asymptote) at relatively high lobster densities. Herein, we describe how this predator-prey framework
could be applied to fisheries management for the spiny lobster. Our approach consisted of SCUBA diver surveys of lobster distribution and abundance patterns immediately before and after the 2 d recreational 'mini-season' coupled with counts of
recreational boats and divers to assess the aggregative response of divers to lobster density. During the mini-season, the density of boats along coral patch reefs and patch heads was over 900x higher than during the regular fishing season ~3 wk later.
Overall, there was a 95 and 79% decline in mean lobster densities in the patch reef and patch head habitats, respectively. Fishing effort was 10x greater on patch heads than on reefs, probably due to ~100-fold higher lobster densities in patch-head
habitats. In both patch reefs and heads, the proportion of lobsters removed by divers was density-independent (Type I functional response). Diver catch never reached saturation at natural lobster densities. Thus, recreational divers have a relatively
simple predatory response to spiny lobsters, whereby catch rates increase linearly with lobster density such that catch is a reliable indicator of abundance. A major concern is that the current levels of lobster exploitation by sport divers are extremely
high (~90%); however, diver predation pressure is not expected to increase proportionally with a decline in lobster density, which could exacerbate local extinction. Management actions that reduce diver effort should have a concomitant reduction in catch.
The recreational diver-lobster predator-prey construct in this study provides a useful predictive framework on which to build as the spatiotemporal scales of measurements expand, management actions are implemented, and the lobster population varies.
KEY WORDS: Caribbean spiny lobster · Density-independence · Fishery management · Recreational fishing impacts · Florida Keys · Functional response · Maximum likelihood · Overfishing · Predator-prey theory
Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol.
257
(2003) on August 7
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2003
|