IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 | |
MEPS 256:229-242 (2003)
|
Abstract
|
Distributional patterns of a marine bird and its prey: habitat selection based on prey and conspecific behaviour
Gail K. Davoren1,*, William A. Montevecchi1, John T. Anderson2
1Biopsychology Programme, Departments of Biology and Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland A1B 3X9, Canada
2Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. John's, Newfoundland A1C 5X1, Canada
*Email: z73gkd@mun.ca
ABSTRACT: We examined distributional patterns of a pursuit-diving seabird, the common murre Uria aalge, and its fish prey, capelin Mallotus villosus, within the avian foraging range of the largest murre colony in eastern North America: Funk
Island, Newfoundland. During chick-rearing, the foraging habitat was previously partitioned into: (1) a high-quality area, 45 km from the colony where energy-rich capelin schools were found, which were spatially and temporally persistent and (2) a
low-quality area, 60 km from the colony where schools were composed of lower-energy capelin that were ephemeral. At the scale of the foraging range (meso-scale: 1 to 100 km), murres were highly clustered into 25% of the surveyed area, with fewer murres in
the low-quality relative to the high-quality area. There were tighter associations among murre and capelin aggregations in the low-quality (1.2 ± 0.2 km) relative to the high-quality area (2.6 ± 0.4 km). This likely resulted from the divergent capelin
behaviour and, thus, different foraging strategies used by murres to search for (e.g. memory vs local enhancement) and capture prey. At fine spatial scales (250 m2) within foraging areas, murres were found at lower densities (mode: 2 murres),
revealing that interference competition among individuals may be important during prey capture. Modeling revealed that at >50 murres per 250 m in the high-quality area, a murre would have a >90% chance of increasing its foraging efficiency by
switching to forage in the low-quality area. Overall, this scale-dependent aggregative behaviour of murres suggests that cooperative foraging among conspecifics may be important in locating prey at the scale of a foraging range, or murres may simply
aggregate in areas of high prey abundance, but competitive interactions among conspecifics become important at the scale of prey capture.
KEY WORDS: Habitat selection · Scale · Predator-prey theory · Competition · Model · Ideal free distribution · Common murre · Capelin
Full text in pdf format
Published in MEPS Vol.
256
(2003) on July 17
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2003
|
