IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 |  |
MEPS 253:67-75 (2003)
|
Abstract
|

Methodological bias in the estimations of important meroplanktonic components from near-shore bottoms
Simone Mariani1,*, María Jesús Uriz1, Xavier Turon2
1Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes, C/ACC. Cala S. Francesc 14, 17300 Blanes (GI), Spain
2Departament de Biologia Animal (Invertebrats), Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avgda. Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
*Email: simone@ceab.csic.es

ABSTRACT: In spite of the many direct observations on larval release, the presence of lecithotrophic larvae of sponges and bryozoans has either been anecdotally or never reported in plankton studies. We collected plankton over an artificial rocky reef and
on adjacent sandy bottoms in the NW Mediterranean and compared larval abundance and species richness of the major groups of invertebrates found over each of such substrates. Observations in the laboratory showed that formalin (4% in seawater)
irreversibly damaged most sponge larvae. To elude the effects of preservation and make it possible to culture larvae for later identification of juveniles, the samples were first identified in vivo and successively fixed. We compared larval
abundance and species richness of the major groups of invertebrates found between samples observed in vivo and after preservation with formalin (a posteriori). The majority of the sponge larvae (93%) were only visible in the samples observed
in vivo whereas abundance estimations of bryozoan and ascidian larvae were equally achieved with both methods. Estimations of the species richness were biased after sample preservation for sponge and bryozoan larvae. We found significant
differences between the numbers of planktotrophic larvae observed a posteriori and in vivo. Sponge larvae were the most abundant plankton collected over the reef where the adults live (38% of the total larvae; maximum: 100 ind.
m-3) and among the most abundant over the sandy bottom (13%). Bryozoan and ascidian larvae were scarce over both substrates (<1% of the total) even though they were more abundant near parental habitats than on the sandy bottoms. Gastropod
and mussel veligers and spionid larvae were the most abundant planktotrophic larvae. Early and late developmental stages of long-lived larvae such as those of barnacles and late stages of polychaetes and echinoderms were mostly collected over parental
habitats (either the reef or sandy bottoms). From this report it appears that the importance of lecithotrophic larvae of sponges and bryozoans in near-shore meroplankton assemblages needs to be examined further.
KEY WORDS: Invertebrate larvae · Sponges · Bryozoans · Dispersal · Formalin preservation
Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol.
253
(2003) on May 15
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2003
|