IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 |  |
MEPS 247:27-42 (2003)
|
Abstract
|

Composition and biomass of phytoplankton assemblages in coastal Antarctic waters: a comparison of chemotaxonomic and microscopic analyses
Irene A. Garibotti1,*, María Vernet2, Wendy A. Kozlowski2, Martha E. Ferrario3
1Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales, CRICyT, CONICET, C.C. 330, 5500 Mendoza, Argentina
2Marine Research Division, Scripps Institute of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0218, USA
3División de Ficología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 1900 La Plata, Argentina
*Email: ireneg@lab.cricyt.edu.ar

ABSTRACT: We describe the distribution of phytoplanktonic community composition and biomass from the Western Antarctic Peninsula coast (between 64° and 68°S) using 2 analytical techniques: microscopy and HPLC of photosynthetic pigments. Phytoplankton
biomass was estimated as chlorophyll a (chl a) by HPLC and chemotaxonomic quantification of microalgae biomass was performed by multiple regression analysis of pigment concentrations. For the estimation of chl a:diagnostic pigment
ratios, it was found of primary importance to differentiate between phytoplankton assemblages within the study area. Three assemblages were differentiated according to their total standing stock and analyzed independently. Phytoplankton biomass was also
estimated as carbon (C) concentration by microscopic analysis of cell abundance and biovolumes. Microscopy and chemotaxonomy give a high level of agreement for phytoplankton characterization, showing an on/offshore gradient, with high diatom and
cryptophyte biomass in coastal waters, and a mixed assemblage with low biomass in open waters. This gradient was not observed in total cell abundance, indicating that the biomass gradient is controlled by cell size. Microscopy also showed shifts in diatom
species throughout the area. C and chl a biomass estimates for the individual microalgae groups were strongly correlated for cryptophytes, chlorophytes and most diatoms, but did poorly for dinoflagellates, prymnesiophytes and chrysophytes. From
this study, we conclude that both microscopy and chemotaxonomy can be used to accurately characterize phytoplankton assemblages, but some limitations are present in both techniques. Based on phytoplankton C concentrations, we estimated an average in
situ growth rate of 0.28 d-1. In situ cell C:chl a ratios had high variability (from 40 to 220) and were non-linearly related to sample growth rates. Significant differences were found among average C:chl a ratios of
low (<1 µg chl a l-1) and high biomass communities (>1 µg chl a l-1), with values of 112 and 74 µg C µg-1 chl a, respectively. In addition, our results support the hypothesis that C quotas of
diatoms and other microalgae do not differ greatly from each other, as previously believed.
KEY WORDS: Phytoplankton composition · Microscopy · Chemotaxonomy · Photosynthetic pigments · Western Antarctic Peninsula
Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol.
247
(2003) on February 4
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2003
|