IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 |  |
MEPS 233:241-252 (2002)
|
Abstract
|

Size-dependent vulnerability of juvenile bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli to bluefish predation: Does large body size always provide a refuge?
Frederick S. Scharf1,*, Jeffrey A. Buckel2, Francis Juanes1
1Department of Natural Resources Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA
2Department of Zoology, North Carolina State University, Center for Marine Sciences and Technology, 303 College Circle, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557, USA
*Present address: NOAA/NMFS/NEFSC, James J. Howard Marine Laboratory, 74 Magruder Road, Highlands, New Jersey 07732, USA. E-mail: fred.scharf@noaa.gov

ABSTRACT: Bay anchovy are known to be an important component of food webs in estuarine and coastal waters along the US east coast. Despite their role as a primary forage species for several top-level predators in these systems, very little is known about
their behavioral interactions with predators and the vulnerability of post-larval life stages to predation. In this study, we examined the vulnerability of juvenile bay anchovy to age-0 bluefish predation using a size-structured laboratory design. For a
range of bay anchovy and bluefish body sizes, we determined predator capture success, handling time costs, feeding rates, and prey profitabilities as functions of relative prey size. We evaluated bluefish size selection when offered different sizes of bay
anchovy simultaneously and identified behavioral characteristics of prey that may contribute to disparate rates of attack. Bluefish capture success was high on small relative prey sizes (<30% of predator size) and remained high on larger relative prey
sizes (>50% of predator size), demonstrating that even large bay anchovy are highly susceptible to capture. Handling time and capture success relationships were combined with prey body mass to generate dome-shaped profitability curves that peaked at
relative prey sizes of 0.50, which is much higher than typically observed for piscivore-prey interactions. Bluefish exhibited strong selection patterns and significantly higher attack rates on large bay anchovy. Disparate attack distributions on large and
small bay anchovy appeared to be caused partly by differences in prey behavior among size groups. Our results suggest that bay anchovy may not achieve a refuge from predation with increased body size and support the importance of predation in shaping bay
anchovy life history.
KEY WORDS: Bay anchovy · Piscivory · Size refuge · Capture success · Behavior
Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol.
233
(2002) on May 21
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2002
|