Marine Ecology Progress Series

Inter-Research
Marine Ecology Progress Series

IR Home



MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe


Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe

Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order

EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)

Discussion Forums
Home

Research
Endangered Species Programs

Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union

Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation

MEPS 233:13-20 (2002)

Abstract

Microbial ecology of ballast water during a transoceanic voyage and the effects of open-ocean exchange

Lisa A. Drake1,*, Gregory M. Ruiz2, Bella S. Galil3, Timothy L. Mullady2, Daniela O. Friedmann3, Fred C. Dobbs1

1Department of Ocean, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Old Dominion University, 4600 Elkhorn Avenue, Norfolk, Virginia 23529, USA
2Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, PO Box 28, Edgewater, Maryland 21037, USA
3National Institute of Oceanography, Israel Oceanographic & Limnological Research, PO Box 8030, Haifa 31080, Israel

*E-mail: ldrake@odu.edu

ABSTRACT: The only procedure used frequently to reduce the risk of invasion by ballast-mediated biota is open-ocean exchange of ballast water, a procedure in which vessels release coastal water and replace it with oceanic water. Limited information exists concerning the effects of transport upon the aquatic microbial community throughout transit and following open-ocean exchange. A transoceanic voyage aboard a commercial bulk carrier afforded us the opportunity to sample the microbial community in exchanged and unexchanged ballast-water holds during the journey from Hadera, Israel to Baltimore, USA. Five days following the exchange process, all microbial metrics tested (i.e. bacteria concentration, virus-like particle density, chl a and phaeopigment concentration, and microbial biomass) had decreased 1.6- to 34-fold from initial values. With respect to microbial measures, no significant differences existed between exchanged and unexchanged holds on Day 15, the final day of sampling. We stress that we quantified differences in total microorganism abundance and biomass, not species composition, and more research is necessary to determine the changes that nonindigenous microorganisms, including potential pathogens, may effect in receiving waters.

KEY WORDS: Bacteria · Invasive species · Management · Non-indigenous species · Non-native species · Policy · Virus

Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol. 233 (2002) on May 21
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599. Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2002

Copyright © 2003; Inter-Research
Webmaster: webmaster@int-res.com