Marine Ecology Progress Series

Inter-Research
Marine Ecology Progress Series

IR Home



MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe


Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe

Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order

EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)

Discussion Forums
Home

Research
Endangered Species Programs

Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union

Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation

MEPS 228:91-101 (2002)

Abstract

Ecosystem modeling analysis of size-structured phytoplankton dynamics in the York River estuary, Virginia (USA). II. Use of a plankton ecosystem model for investigating controlling factors on phytoplankton and nutrient dynamics

Yongsik Sin*, Richard L. Wetzel**

School of Marine Science, Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS), College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, USA

*Present address: Division of Ocean System Engineering, Mokpo National Maritime University, 571-2 Chukyo-dong, Mokpo, Chonnan 530-729, S. Korea **Corresponding author. E-mail: dick@vims.edu

ABSTRACT: An ecosystem simulation model was used to investigate potential mechanisms controlling the size-structured phytoplankton and nutrient dynamics in the mesohaline zone of the York River estuary. The York River ecosystem model (Sin & Wetzel 2001, Mar Ecol Prog Ser 228:75-90)was calibrated and validated based on field observations and laboratory measurements prior to the exercises reported here. Analyses of model sensitivity to state variable changes and parameter variations were performed to examine hypotheses proposed from previous studies regarding controls on phytoplankton and nutrient dynamics in the York River estuary. The model results supported the general view that phytoplankton dynamics may be controlled by abiotic mechanisms (i.e. bottom-up control) rather than biotic, trophic interactions in the estuary. Larger mesozooplankton appear to be controlled by top-down mechanisms. Model sensitivity studies showed that small phytoplankton cells (pico-, nano-) are more likely to be regulated by temperature and light, whereas large cells (micro-) are more likely to be regulated by physical processes such as advection and tidal mixing. Microphytoplankton blooms during winter-spring resulted from a combination of vertical advection and diffusion of phytoplankton cells rather than in situ production.

KEY WORDS: York River estuary · Size-structured phytoplankton and nutrient dynamics · Ecosystem simulation model · Controlling mechanisms · Advection and diffusion

Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol. 228 (2002) on March 6
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599. Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2002

Copyright © 2003; Inter-Research
Webmaster: webmaster@int-res.com