IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 |  |
MEPS 215:107-120 (2001)
|
Abstract
|

Effects of in situ experimental shading on the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica
Juan Manuel Ruiz1,*, Javier Romero2
1Departamento de Ecología e Hidrología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Murcia, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Murcia, Spain
2Departament d'Ecologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avda. Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
*Present address: Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Murcia, 30740 Lo Pagán, San Pedro del Pinatar, Murcia, Spain. E-mail: jmruiz@mu.ieo.es

ABSTRACT: The response of the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile to in situ light reduction was examined over a 4 mo period (May to August) in 1993 and 1995. Shoot density, leaf growth rate, shoot size, photosynthetic
activity, carbohydrate reserves, epiphyte load and tissue nutrient concentrations were measured in replicated plots under the following light conditions: ambient (36% of surface irradiance [SI] control plots), moderately shaded plots (16.7% SI, MS plots)
and severely shaded plots (10.4% SI, SS plots). By the end of the experimental period, all shoots under SS treatments had died, while 70 to 80% had survived under MS treatment; in control plots, shoot densities had remained almost constant. Leaf growth
rate and biomass decrease with shading were evident 30 d after the beginning of the experiment; shoot density and number of leaves per shoot also fell with shading, but this was apparent only 60 to 90 d after the onset of the shading treatments. Epiphyte
load was also considerably reduced by shading. Photosynthetic activity (Pmax) and dark respiration rates (R) of control plants showed a characteristic increase from spring (May) to the end of summer (August), resulting in higher
saturation (Isat) and compensation (Ic) points and lower photosynthetic efficiencies (a) at the end of the experimental period; however, photosynthetic parameters in shaded plants (MS
treatment) first increased (as in control plots) from May to June, but decreased afterwards (from June to August), indicating photoacclimation of P. oceanica to low light conditions. Shading depressed carbohydrate storage in the rhizomes of shaded
plants, in which starch concentrations were quickly reduced to 60% of those of control plants. The leaves of shaded shoots showed a significant increase in nutrient (specially nitrogen) concentrations. This was probably due to translocation from shed
leaves and also to low utilisation rates for growth. We infer that minimum light requirements of P. oceanica are between 16 and 10%, of surface irradiance, values which are consistent with light availability at the deep limits of nearby meadows.
One year after shades had been removed, shoot densities remained unchanged (relative to the moment of screen removal), indicating both the absence of cascading effects and a very low recovery capacity of this seagrass.
KEY WORDS: Shading · Seagrass decline · Photosynthesis · Carbohydrates
Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol.
215
(2001) on May 31
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2001
|