IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
 | |
MEPS 211:169-179 (2001)
|
Abstract
|
Influence of incubation conditions on the anoxic survival of marine bivalves. Static and semi-static incubations
Albertus de Zwaan1,*, Otello Cattani2, Giovanni Vitali2, Paolo Cortesi2
1Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Centre for Estuarine and Coastal Ecology, PO Box 140, 4400 AC Yerseke, The Netherlands
2Department of Biochemistry, Veterinary Section, University of Bologna, Via Tolara di sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia (Bologna), Italy
*E-mail: zwaan@cemo.nioo.knaw.nl
ABSTRACT: In a comparative study of 4 bivalve species we show that the apparent widely different tolerances in survival time observed in a closed system filled with N2-gassed seawater is mainly due to the experimental conditions. Both a high
dose of cadmium and the antibiotic chloramphenicol increase survival time 2- to 4-fold. Without precautions for bacterial growth, the survival time of the most tolerant species, Scapharca inaequivalvis, is about 4 times longer than that of the most
sensitive species, Venus gallina. The other bivalves Tapes philippinarum and Mytilus galloprovincialis, have intermediate survival times. When proliferation of bacteria is prevented by chloramphenicol, the survival time of S.
inaequivalvis remains the highest; however under these conditions the other 3 species show similar survival times. Bacteria cause a drop in pH of the incubation medium and the accumulation of sulphide. S. inaequivalvis exhibits a significant
decrease in survival time in the presence of exogenous sulphide. The antibiotic postpones the accumulation of sulphide, but a significant population of sulphate-reducing bacteria is able to survive in its presence. In the case of V. gallina and
M. galloprovincialis, exogenous sulphide (up to 400 µM) does not affect the improved survival time due to the antibiotic. This holds also for a decrease in pH. Bacterial toxins other than sulphide or direct action on the integrity of the organism
must be responsible for the adverse effects on survival. The responsible micro-organisms are associated with the bivalves, and anoxia induces their proliferation. For this reason, accumulation of bacterial noxious products cannot be avoided by frequent
renewal of the medium.
KEY WORDS: Benthic macrofauna · Bivalves · Hydrogen sulphide · Anaerobiosis · Cadmium · Chloramphenicol · Anoxic resistance
Full text in pdf format
Published in MEPS Vol.
211
(2001) on February 14
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2001
|
