Marine Ecology Progress Series

Inter-Research
Marine Ecology Progress Series

IR Home



MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe


Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
ESR
Search
Subscribe

Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order

EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)

Discussion Forums
Home

Research
IR Research

Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union

Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation

MEPS 210:41-53 (2001)

Abstract

Removal of red- and brown-tide cells using clay flocculation. I. Laboratory culture experiments with Gymnodinium breve and Aureococcus anophagefferens

Mario R. Sengco1,*, Aishao Li1, Kimberley Tugend2, David Kulis1, Donald M. Anderson1

1Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Biology Department, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA
2University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA

*E-mail: msengco@whoi.edu

ABSTRACT: Twenty-five domestic clays and Loess clay from South Korea were tested for their ability to flocculate and remove cells of Gymnodinium breve (the Florida red-tide organism) and Aureococcus anophagefferens (the New York brown-tide organism). Twelve clay samples, consisting mostly of montmorillonite, bentonite and Florida phosphatic clay displayed removal efficiencies greater than 90% against G. breve at a clay loading of 0.25 g l-1. Further tests with IMC-P2 phosphatic clay indicated that removal rates can reach as high as 80% at 0.04 g l-1. In contrast, the removal values at 0.25 g l-1 against A. anophagefferens did not exceed 40% for all clays, but increased to 80% when the clay was dispersed throughout the culture at the time of addition. The removal efficiency of aluminum sulfate (alum), polyaluminum chloride (PAC), and 4 organic flocculants were significantly lower than clays against both organisms (30 to 50%). However, the addition of 5 ppm PAC lowered the amount of clay needed for removal of G. breve by 1 order of magnitude at low clay concentrations. G. breve fully recovered and remained viable at clay loadings below 0.03 g l-1, with or without resuspension of the flocs, although their recovery and subsequent growth were delayed by 24 h compared to untreated cells. High cell mortality (up to 100%) and no recovery were observed at clay amounts of ≥0 g l-1, even with daily resuspension of the clay/cell pellet. At intermediate clay loadings (e.g. 0.10 to 0.25 g l-1), survival and recovery depended on several factors: clay amount, the frequency of resuspension, or the duration of contact between the cells and clays prior to the first resuspension event. Regardless of clay loading, cell mortality was extremely low (near zero) after 2.5 h of contact, but increased significantly after 12 h. Preliminary data suggest that cell death may be caused by direct physical contact between the cells and clays and not by the release of potentially cytotoxic substances from the clays or from the lysed cells. Overall, these results show that clays differ substantially in their removal efficiencies, that individual clays differ in their ability to remove different algal species, that flocculants such as PAC can significantly improve clay removal efficiencies, and that the flocculation process can also lead to cell mortality.

KEY WORDS: Harmful algal blooms (HABs) · Clay · Management · Control · Flocculation · Gymnodinium breve · Aureococcus anophagefferens

Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol. 210 (2001) on January 26
Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599. Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2001

Copyright © 2005; Inter-Research
Webmaster: webmaster@int-res.com