IR Home
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
Order
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
| |
MEPS 209:43-54 (2001)
|
Abstract
|

Colony size-frequency distributions of scleractinian coral populations: spatial and interspecific variation
E.H.Meesters1,*, M.Hilterman2, E.Kardinaal2, M.Keetman2, M. deVries2, R.P.M.Bak1,2
1Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), PO Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands
2Institute for Systematics and Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, 1090GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*E-mail: erikm@nioz.nl

ABSTRACT: Colony size is an important characteristic for clonal modular organisms such as corals because life-history processes, e.g. reproduction and mortality, are strongly related to size. These processes are affected by the environment, and
size-frequency distributions of coral populations provide information on the responses of populations to environmental conditions. We hypothesised that the size-frequency structure of coral populations in degraded environments would differ from those in a
more pristine environment. We used log-transformed colony-size data of 13 coral species from the fringing reefs of Curaçao, Netherlands Antilles. Data were collected at 4 sites, representing 2 environments: a heavily urbanised coastal area with degraded
reefs, and an upstream control area. Population structure was dependent on species and site. Size-frequency distributions of the same species from different sites were twice as similar as distributions of different species, indicating the strong effects
of various life-history traits among species. Site effects were indicated by significant differences between distributions of 11 species at 4 sites. Mean colony size varied up to an order of magnitude between species, and much less between sites; however,
in 10 species mean colony size was also significantly different among the 4 sites. The pattern of the differences was not consistent among species, indicating that mean colony size in degraded sites was higher for some species and lower for others.
Parameters describing the shape of the population appeared to reflect a general response to reef condition. In the degraded area, frequency distributions tended to show increased negative skewness, occasionally extreme positive kurtosis, and smaller
standard deviations: 11 populations were generally more negatively skewed, with the bulk of the population concentrated in the larger size classes; kurtosis was on average higher and extremely peaked; and standard deviations indicated that colony size
varied less. This evidence suggests lower recruitment and higher partial mortality in larger colonies in this area. Lower recruitment decreased the influx into the smaller size classes of the populations, and higher partial colony-mortality decreased the
proportion of colonies in the higher size classes while simultaneously increasing the proportion of colonies in the medium-sized classes. Species that attained large sizes (indicative of great age) appeared to have size-frequency distributions skewed to
the left, while small species were more skewed to the right. The data indicate a general dichotomy in coral life-history strategies with respect to colony size, with small species generally having a shorter lifespan and reproduction being relatively
frequent and successful. Thus, new input into smaller size classes occurs continuously. Species that attain large sizes live longer and are less dependent on frequent recruitment, and consequently populations tend to become 'impoverished' in small
colonies, resulting in size-frequency distributions that are skewed to the left. Based on changes in population structure, this research indicates that some species, such as Colpophyllia natans and Diploria labyrinthiformis, are relatively
sensitive to environmental conditions.
KEY WORDS: Coral reefs · Degradation · Monitoring · Health · Pollution · Size hierarchy · Population structure
Full text in pdf format

Published in MEPS Vol.
209
(2001) on January 5
ISSN: 0171-8630.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2001
|