Marine Ecology Progress Series Inter-Research
Marine Ecology Progress Series

Inter-Research



MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe


Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
Search
Subscribe

Books
Top Books
EE Books
Order

ECI
Home

EEIU
Home

MEPS 186:283-292 (1999)

Abstract

Experimental evaluation of the roles of habitat selection and interspecific competition in determining patterns of host use by two anemonefishes

Maya Srinivasan*, Geoffrey P. Jones, M. Julian Caley

School of Marine Biology and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia

*E-mail: maya.srinivasan@jcu.edu.au

ABSTRACT: We examined the roles of interspecific competition and habitat preference in determining the distribution of 2 anemonefish species, Premnas biaculeatus and Amphiprion melanopus, among the 2 morphs of the anemone Entacmaea quadricolour. This anemone species has a solitary morph which is usually occupied by a single pair of P. biaculeatus and a colonial morph which is usually occupied by large social groups of A. melanopus. The possibility that interspecific competition, and/or preference of adults of each species of fish for the anemone morph it usually occupies, determines this distribution was tested using aquarium based experiments. Adults of one species, A. melanopus, displayed a preference for the anemone morph it usually occupies in the field, but P. biaculeatus did not. Instead, P. biaculeatus pairs tended to associate closely, always occupying the same anemone regardless of the morph chosen. While interspecific competition limited fish abundance within anemones, competitive interactions could not explain the distribution of fish species among anemone morphs. That is, neither fish species displaced the other more often on the anemone morph it usually occupies in the field. While juvenile P. biaculeatus exhibit some preference for solitary morphs and A. melanopus appear to prefer colonial morphs, juvenile distributions cannot fully explain the distribution of adults. Instead, we suggest that adult distributions are explained by a combination of juvenile habitat preferences, adult-juvenile interactions and constraints imposed by the contrasting social systems of the 2 species.

KEY WORDS: Habitat selection · Interspecific competition · Distribution · Specialisation · Coral-reef fish · Anemonefish · Amphiprion melanopus · Premnas biaculeatus

Published in MEPS Vol. 186 (1999) on September 17
ISSN: 0171-8630. Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 1999

Copyright © 1999; Inter-Research Science Publisher
Webmaster: webmaster@int-res.com