Marine Ecology Progress Series Inter-Research
Marine Ecology Progress Series

Inter-Research



MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe


Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
Search
Subscribe

Books
Top Books
EE Books
Order

ECI
Home

EEIU
Home

MEPS 172:37-51 (1998)

Abstract

Density, biomass and productivity of animals in four subtidal rocky reef habitats: the importance of small mobile invertebrates

Richard B. Taylor*

Leigh Marine Laboratory and School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, PO Box 349, Warkworth, New Zealand

*Present address: Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3431 Arendell St., Morehead City, North Carolina 28557, USA. E-mail: rbtaylor@mail.clis.com

ABSTRACT: Density, biomass and productivity of animals >0.5 mm were estimated in 4 shallow subtidal rocky reef habitats in temperate northeastern New Zealand. The main objective was to determine the relative contributions of mobile epifauna (0.5-10 mm) and megafauna (>10 mm) to the flux of materials on the reef. The habitats surveyed were (1) Carpophyllum plumosum var. capillifolium forest (Phaeophyceae: Fucales), (2) Ecklonia radiata forest (Phaeophyceae: Laminariales), (3) urchin barrens, and (4) articulated coralline algal turf flats. Epifauna comprised >99.5% of individuals in each habitat. Epifauna dominated biomass (>86%) in the finely structured Carpophyllum forest and turf flats, where they contributed >97% of total secondary productivity. Although lower in the other 2 habitats, the epifaunal contribution to total secondary productivity was still ~78% on the scale of the entire reef. These results show that epifauna are major contributors to the flux of materials in rocky reef habitats, and should therefore be included in trophic models of these systems. Consumption by fish could only account for ~26% of epifaunal production, with the fate of the remainder unknown. Estimated annual secondary productivity within the Carpophyllum forest and turf flats habitats (100 to 115 g AFDW m-2 yr-1) was higher than literature values for a range of soft sediment habitats, and was exceeded only by 2 other hard-bottom communities.

KEY WORDS: Biomass · Epifauna · Kelp forest · New Zealand · Rocky reef · Seaweed · Secondary productivity

Published in MEPS Vol. 172 (1998) on October 22
ISSN: 0171-8630. Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 1998

Copyright © 1999; Inter-Research Science Publisher
Webmaster: webmaster@int-res.com