Inter-Research
MEPS
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
Search
Subscribe
Books
Top Books
EE Books
Order
ECI
Home
EEIU
Home
| |
MEPS 167:241-259 (1998)
|
Abstract
|

Comparative foraging ecology of planktivorous auklets in relation to ocean physics and prey availability
George L. Hunt Jr1,*, Robert W. Russell1,**, Kenneth O. Coyle2, Thomas Weingartner2
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA 2Institute of Marine Sciences, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA
*E-mail: glhunt@uci.edu **Present address: Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803-3126, USA

ABSTRACT: We tested the hypothesis that the spatial distributions of foraging least, crested and parakeet auklets (Aethia pusilla, A. cristatella and A. psittacula, respectively) in the shallow passes of the Aleutian Islands would be determined
by physical mechanisms that control near-surface prey concentrations. We recorded currents using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler, volume scattering using 200 and 420 kHz scientific echosounders, and the numbers of foraging birds. Zooplankton were
sampled using a multiple opening/closing net and environmental sampling system (MOCNESS). Prey choice of birds was ascertained by collecting foraging birds and examining their stomach contents. Most sampling occurred between 8 July and 6 August 1993, when
we conducted 50 passages along a transect that crossed a sill between Unalga and Kavalga Islands, western Aleutian Islands, thereby sampling the foraging activity of auklets at a variety of times of day and tidal phases. We found that the abundance of
foraging individuals of each of the 3 auklet species was a function of tidal speed. Auklet species were selective about the species of prey taken. Regardless of tidal direction, crested auklets foraged on euphausiids upwelled on the upstream side of the
pass, whereas least auklets consumed copepods concentrated in near-surface convergences on the downstream side. Parakeet auklets foraged over the top of the pass and took fish and invertebrates. Tidal speed and direction influenced the distance between
the peak numbers of some, but not all, species of auklets. Auklet prey preferences dictated where they foraged in the pass and the physical mechanisms exploited for successful foraging. Thus, in this instance, resource partitioning by these closely
related planktivores was enhanced by a spatial segregation forced by the physical processes that enhanced the availability of prey. Our findings emphasize the important role of physical processes in the structuring of marine communities.
KEY WORDS: Biological-physical coupling · Tidal fronts · Least auklet · Crested auklet · Parakeet auklet · Aethia pusilla · Aethia cristatella · Aethia psittacula · Seabird foraging ecology

Published in MEPS Vol.
167
(1998) on June 18
ISSN: 0171-8630.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 1998
|