Aquatic Microbial Ecology

Inter-Research
Aquatic Microbial Ecology

IR Home



AME
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe


Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
ESR
Search
Subscribe

Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order

EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)

Discussion Forums
Home

Research
IR Research

Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union

Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation

AME 38:53-69 (2005)

Abstract

Microbenthos in a hypersaline tidal lagoon: factors affecting microhabitat, community structure and mass exchange at the sediment-water interface

J. García de Lomas*, A. Corzo, C. M. García, S. A. van Bergeijk

Depto. Biología (Área Ecología), Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Ambientales, Pol. Río San Pedro s/n, 11510 Puerto Real (Cádiz), Spain

*Email: juan.garciadelomas@uca.es

ABSTRACT: Three benthic microbial communities from a hypersaline lagoon with tidal influence were studied: a compact microbial mat, a ‘fluffy’ microbial mat and a non-cohesive diatom-dominated sediment. In each community, qualitative and quantitative analyses of phototrophs, meio- and macrofauna were done. Vertical profiles of oxygen, sulfide and pH were measured at the sediment-water interface using microelectrodes. Physico-chemical properties of the water column were also assessed. The most compact mat, dominated by Microcoleus chthonoplastes, had the highest photosynthetic biomass, while meio- and macrofauna were nearly absent. The compact mat showed the steepest physico-chemical microgradients and the highest fluxes of oxygen and sulfide. The ‘fluffy’ mat had an areal amount of chl a similar to the compact mat and contained a higher abundance of meiofauna. This mat showed the deepest oxic layer. The diatom-dominated sediment comprised a high abundance of macrofauna, but meiofauna were very scarce. This community presented relatively smoother microgradients and intermediate values of internal fluxes of oxygen. Our results show the close relationship between the structure of the microbenthic communities, net metabolism, and the exchange of mass at the water-sediment interface. Changes in biotic and abiotic factors determined the spatial distribution of each microbial community.

KEY WORDS: Microbenthic community · Microbial mat · Meiofauna · Macrofauna · Microelectrodes · Biotic factors · Abiotic factors

Full text in pdf format

Published in AME Vol. 38, No. 1 (2005) on January 21
Print ISSN: 0948-3055; Online ISSN: 1616-1564. Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2005

Copyright © 2005; Inter-Research
Webmaster: webmaster@int-res.com