IR Home
AME
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
![](../../../../images/pixel.gif) | ![](../../../../images/pixel.gif) |
AME 33:181-190 (2003)
|
Abstract
|
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
Effect of copepods on estuarine microbial plankton in short-term microcosms
J. Sipura1,*, E. Lores2, R. A. Snyder3
1Department of Biology, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, Turku 20014, Finland
2US Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Ecology Division, 1 Sabine Island Drive, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561, USA
3Center for Environmental Diagnostics and Bioremediation, Biology Department, University of West Florida, 11000 University Parkway, Pensacola, Florida 32514, USA
*Email: jaana.sipura@utu.fi
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
ABSTRACT: We examined the effects of copepod feeding on estuarine microbial plankton, including bacteria, cyanobacteria, heterotrophic and autotrophic nanoflagellates, microzooplankton and larger phytoplankton cells, to elucidate any short-term control or
release phenomena. As an example of such potential effects, it was hypothesized that through omnivory Acartia tonsa would reduce both competitors (large phytoplankton) and predators (microzooplankton) of small autotrophic flagellates, allowing the
latter to proliferate. Copepod addition and removal treatments were conducted in 24 l containers in triplicate. As expected, the copepods significantly decreased both microzooplankton and large phytoplankton populations, and blooms of ciliates and
diatoms (the dominant phytoplankton group) were apparent in the copepod removal treatment. Effects were qualitative (species composition changes) as well as quantitative. However, beyond this immediate impact, community level cascades in the microbial
food web were not found, likely due to consumer recycling of resources and trophic level heterogeneity. Bacterioplankton responded positively to the addition of copepods, but negatively to the bloom of diatoms in the copepod removal treatment. These
results suggest that the effects of copepods on the structure and function of estuarine microbial plankton communities may be more complex than simple linear effects would predict.
KEY WORDS: Acartia tonsa · Microbial plankton · Grazing · Recycling · Trophic cascade
Full text in pdf format
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
Published in AME Vol.
33, No. 2
(2003) on October 14
Print ISSN: 0948-3055; Online ISSN: 1616-1564.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2003
|