Aquatic Microbial Ecology

Inter-Research
Aquatic Microbial Ecology

IR Home



AME
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe


Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe

Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order

EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)

Discussion Forums
Home

Research
Endangered Species Programs

Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union

Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation

AME 33:155-161 (2003)

Abstract

Ultraplankton distribution in surface waters of the Mozambique Channel--flow cytometry and satellite imagery

Mikhail V. Zubkov*, Graham D. Quartly

Southampton Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK

*Email: mvz@soc.soton.ac.uk

ABSTRACT: The composition of ultraplankton (UP) in near-surface samples collected underway every 1 to 6 h from a ship sailing from Durban to the Seychelles was determined by flow cytometry, using both autofluorescence pigments and fluorescence DNA staining. Prochlorococcus (Pro) (17 to 160 x 103 cells ml-1) numerically dominated the ultraphytoplankton (UPP), followed by Synechococcus (Syn) (4.5 to 57 x 103 cells ml-1) and eukaryotic algae (EA) (0.6 to 4.2 x 103 cells ml-1). The abundance of heterotrophic bacterioplankton (HB) was 0.4 to 1.3 x 106 cells ml-1. A strong correlation (r = 0.8 to 0.97) was observed between sea-viewing wide field of view sensor (SeaWiFS) satellite estimates of total chlorophyll a (chl a) concentration and chl a concentration, abundance and biomass of EA as well as abundance and biomass of HB. This shows the potential for deducing spatial distributions of these 2 groups for ecosystem modelling using satellite data. Although the correlation between satellite chl a estimates and Syn chl a concentration was strong (r = 0.83 to 0.88), the correlation with its abundance and biomass was poor (r < 0.6) due to high variability (factor of 12) in cellular chl a content and to a lesser extent to diurnal cycles. The relationships were similar when either only daytime or all UP measurements were compared with the satellite data. No relationship was found between satellite data and Pro chl a concentration, abundance or biomass, even after correction for a pronounced diel cycle, suggesting that the SeaWiFS instrument might not detect Pro chl a.

KEY WORDS: Picoeukaryotic algae · Synechococcus · Prochlorococcus · Cyanobacteria · Bacterioplankton · Picoplankton · Remote sensing · Sea surface temperature · Sea surface colour · Chlorophyll

Full text in pdf format

Published in AME Vol. 33, No. 2 (2003) on October 14
Print ISSN: 0948-3055; Online ISSN: 1616-1564. Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2003

Copyright © 2004; Inter-Research
Webmaster: webmaster@int-res.com