IR Home
AME
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
EEIU Brochures
(pdf format)
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
![](../../../../images/pixel.gif) | ![](../../../../images/pixel.gif) |
AME 33:11-18 (2003)
|
Abstract
|
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
Interpretation of nutrient-enrichment bioassays by looking at sub-populations in a marine bacterial community
Gro Anita Fonnes Flaten1,*, Tonje Castberg2, Tsuneo Tanaka1,3, T. Frede Thingstad1
1Department of Microbiology, University of Bergen, Jahnebakken 5, 5020 Bergen, Norway
2Institute of Marine Research, Department of Coastal Zone, Flødevigen Marine Research Station, 4817 His, Norway
3LOV-UMR7093, Station Zoologique, BP 28, 06234 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France
*Email: gro-anita.flaten@im.uib.no
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
ABSTRACT: Nutrient-enrichment bioassays represent one frequently applied way of assessing the nutrient status of natural bacterial communities. Interpretation of these is normally based on gross community responses like total bacterial abundance or
production. To add more resolution, we supplemented these gross community measures with bacterial community analysis using DGGE and FCM. Sub-samples from a fjord on the Norwegian west coast were incubated in triplicate assay bottles spiked with organic C
(glucose), mineral N (NH4Cl) and P (KH2PO4) in all 8 possible combinations. Both 24 and 72 h after nutrient addition, 3H-leucine incorporation in all cultures enriched with organic C (alone or in combinations
with N and P) was higher than for all non-C treatments, consistent with an interpretation of a C-limited bacterial community in the original sample. FCM demonstrated an increase in the high-DNA fraction of the bacterial community, indicating either a
growth of these as a subpopulation, or a shift from low to high DNA of bacteria activated by the added glucose. DGGE analysis revealed different band patterns in C-enriched cultures compared to non-C treatments, indicating that only one or a few
sub-populations responded with a higher growth rate to the C substrate given. The conclusion from gross community responses should therefore be interpreted only with care as indicating C-limitation for all sub-populations in the bacterial community.
KEY WORDS: Bacteria · Nutrient limitation · Bioassay · DGGE
Full text in pdf format
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
Published in AME Vol.
33, No. 1
(2003) on August 21
Print ISSN: 0948-3055; Online ISSN: 1616-1564.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2003
|