IR Home
AME
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe
Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe
Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order
Discussion Forums
Home
Research
Endangered Species Programs
Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union
Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation
| |
AME 29:145-159 (2002)
|
Abstract
|
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
Competition for inorganic nutrients between phytoplankton and bacterioplankton in nutrient manipulated mesocosms
Ian Joint1,*, Peter Henriksen2, Gro Anita Fonnes3, David Bourne3, T. Frede Thingstad3, Bo Riemann2
1Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, United Kingdom
2Department of Marine Ecology, National Environment Research Institute, PO Box 358, Roskilde 4000, Denmark
3Department of Microbiology, University of Bergen, Jahnebakken 5, 5020 Bergen, Norway
*E-mail: i.joint@pml.ac.uk
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
ABSTRACT: A manipulative mesocosm experiment in Danish coastal waters tested the effect on plankton biodiversity and function of adding nitrate, phosphate and glucose. A comprehensive set of measurements was made over a 6 d period; these included
phytoplankton biomass and production in 3 size fractions (>10, 10-2 and <2 µm), bacterial biomass and production, nitrate and ammonium uptake, and pigment taxonomy. Addition of nitrate and phosphate resulted in increases of biomass and production of
all size fractions of phytoplankton. Inorganic nutrients alone had only a minor effect on bacterial abundance and production, with slight increases relative to the control. The largest changes occurred in mesocosms to which glucose was added in excess
with nitrate and phosphate. Pigment composition indicated little change in phytoplankton assemblage composition in any treatment. A large increase in bacterial activity in the presence of added glucose had a negative effect on the phytoplankton assemblage
and resulted in a decline in phytoplankton biomass. Data on nutrient uptake and size-fractionated carbon fixation suggest that the mechanism of this phytoplankton suppression was the ability of heterotrophic bacteria to out-compete for available
inorganic nutrients, resulting in nutrient limitation of the phytoplankton assemblage.
KEY WORDS: Phytoplankton/bacterial competition · Nutrient uptake · Pigment taxonomy · Mesocosm
Full text in pdf format
![](../../../../images/hline.gif)
Published in AME Vol.
29, No. 2
(2002) on September 23
Print ISSN: 0948-3055; Online ISSN: 1616-1564.
Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2002
|