Aquatic Microbial Ecology Inter-Research
Aquatic Microbial Ecology

IR Home



AME
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe


Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe

Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
ESEP Books
Order

Discussion Forums
Home

Research
Endangered Species Programs

Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union

Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation

AME 29:145-159 (2002)

Abstract

Competition for inorganic nutrients between phytoplankton and bacterioplankton in nutrient manipulated mesocosms

Ian Joint1,*, Peter Henriksen2, Gro Anita Fonnes3, David Bourne3, T. Frede Thingstad3, Bo Riemann2

1Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, United Kingdom
2Department of Marine Ecology, National Environment Research Institute, PO Box 358, Roskilde 4000, Denmark
3Department of Microbiology, University of Bergen, Jahnebakken 5, 5020 Bergen, Norway

*E-mail: i.joint@pml.ac.uk

ABSTRACT: A manipulative mesocosm experiment in Danish coastal waters tested the effect on plankton biodiversity and function of adding nitrate, phosphate and glucose. A comprehensive set of measurements was made over a 6 d period; these included phytoplankton biomass and production in 3 size fractions (>10, 10-2 and <2 µm), bacterial biomass and production, nitrate and ammonium uptake, and pigment taxonomy. Addition of nitrate and phosphate resulted in increases of biomass and production of all size fractions of phytoplankton. Inorganic nutrients alone had only a minor effect on bacterial abundance and production, with slight increases relative to the control. The largest changes occurred in mesocosms to which glucose was added in excess with nitrate and phosphate. Pigment composition indicated little change in phytoplankton assemblage composition in any treatment. A large increase in bacterial activity in the presence of added glucose had a negative effect on the phytoplankton assemblage and resulted in a decline in phytoplankton biomass. Data on nutrient uptake and size-fractionated carbon fixation suggest that the mechanism of this phytoplankton suppression was the ability of heterotrophic bacteria to out-compete for available inorganic nutrients, resulting in nutrient limitation of the phytoplankton assemblage.

KEY WORDS: Phytoplankton/bacterial competition · Nutrient uptake · Pigment taxonomy · Mesocosm

Full text in pdf format

Published in AME Vol. 29, No. 2 (2002) on September 23
Print ISSN: 0948-3055; Online ISSN: 1616-1564. Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2002

Copyright © 2002; Inter-Research
Webmaster: webmaster@int-res.com