Aquatic Microbial Ecology Inter-Research
Aquatic Microbial Ecology

IR Home



AME
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe


Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe

Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
Order

Discussion Forums
Home

Research
Endangered Species Programs

Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union

Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation

AME 24:41-49 (2001)

Abstract

Similar bacterial growth on dissolved organic matter in anoxic and oxic lake water

David Bastviken1,*, Jörgen Ejlertsson1, Lars Tranvik2

1Department of Water and Environmental Studies, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
2Department of Limnology, Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden

*E-mail: david.bastviken@tema.liu.se

ABSTRACT: Anoxic metabolism yields less energy per unit substrate utilized than oxic respiration. In addition, substrate availability is believed to be reduced under anoxic conditions since oxygenases cannot be used. Consequently, it is generally assumed that bacteria grow slower in anoxic environments than in oxic environments. The results of the present study challenge this view. We compared the growth of bacterial assemblages under carbon-limited conditions in lake water under anoxic and oxic conditions. Bioassay experiments were performed with water from 3 lakes differing in nutrient concentrations and organic matter content. Among bacteria using the same source of organic matter, median anoxic growth rates were 84 to 110% of oxic growth rates. The total biomass yield during the experiments did not differ between anoxic and oxic treatments. We suggest that anoxic bacterial growth was regulated by substrate availability rather than by metabolic energy yield and that availability of organic matter under anoxic conditions was equal to or even greater than that in oxic treatments. This implies that anoxic decomposition rates may actually have been faster than oxic rates.

KEY WORDS: DOC · DOM · Anaerobic degradation · Bacteria

Full text in pdf format

Published in AME Vol. 24, No. 1 (2001) on March 28
ISSN: 0948-3055. Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2001

Copyright © 2001; Inter-Research
Webmaster: webmaster@int-res.com