Aquatic Microbial Ecology Inter-Research
Aquatic Microbial Ecology

IR Home



AME
Home
Editors
Forthcoming
Information
Subscribe


Journals
Home
MEPS
AME
CR
DAO
ESEP
Search
Subscribe

Book Series
EE Books
Top Books
Order

Discussion Forums
Home

Research
Endangered Species Programs

Institutions
International Ecology Institute
Eco-Ethics International Union

Foundation
Otto Kinne Foundation

AME 17:49-60 (1999)

Abstract

Responses of three freshwater planktonic ciliates with different feeding modes to cryptophyte and diatom prey

Helga Müller*, Anja Schlegel

Limnological Institute, University of Konstanz, PO Box 5560, D-78434 Konstanz, Germany

*E-mail: helga.mueller@uni-konstanz.de

ABSTRACT: The filter feeding oligotrich ciliate Strobilidium lacustris, the raptorial prostome ciliate Balanion planctonicum and the diffusion feeding scuticociliate Histiobalantium bodamicum could be cultivated for months/years on a sole diet of Cryptomonas sp., whereas the diatom Stephanodiscus hantzschii did not support their growth. With Cryptomonas sp. as food, numerical responses of all ciliates followed a modified Michaelis-Menten model, which at 15°C yielded maximum growth rates of 0.96, 1.87 and 0.33 d-1 and threshold concentrations of 61, 78 and 290 ng C ml-1 for S. lacustris, B. planctonicum and H. bodamicum, respectively. Functional response patterns differed between species. In all investigated ciliates, growth rates reached a maximum earlier than ingestion rates, and there were no threshold concentrations for zero ingestion. Food selectivity depended on feeding mode. H. bodamicum was not able to ingest the non-motile diatoms. Both S. lacustris and B. planctonicum selectively preferred cryptophytes when offered a mixed diet. This effect was more pronounced in the raptorial feeder compared to the filter feeder. Our results indicate that during the phytoplankton spring bloom in Lake Constance prostome and oligotrich ciliates mainly exploit cryptophytes, and that the scuticociliate H. bodamicum, due to its slow growth, is an inferior competitor during this season. The observed threshold concentrations suggest that during the rest of the year prostomes and oligotrichs must rely on small-scale patches of this food, whereas H. bodamicum, with maximum development in late summer and autumn, presumably consumes a much larger variety of prey.

KEY WORDS: Ciliate · Numerical response · Functional response · Feeding mode · Selective feeding · Cryptophyte · Diatom · Balanion · Strobilidium · Histiobalantium

Published in AME Vol. 17, No. 1 (1999) on April 30
ISSN: 0948-3055. Copyright © Inter-Research, Oldendorf/Luhe, 1999

Copyright © 2001; Inter-Research
Webmaster: webmaster@int-res.com